About
Articles
Monographs
Working Papers
Reviews
Archive
Contact
 
 

Peter Costello’s International Tax Beauty Contest

Treasurer Costello has instituted a study to ‘internationally benchmark’ Australia’s taxation system to those found in other countries.  The inquiry will report in April, just before the May Budget.  The Treasurer has already indicated that he thinks that Australia’s tax system compares favourably to other OECD countries.  While this is almost certainly true, it is also completely irrelevant. 

The most obvious benchmark for Australia is the US.  The US is itself the scene of a major debate about tax reform, reflecting what many regard as fundamentals flaws in their tax system (for one contribution to the US debate, see here).  To say that Australia compares favourably to other countries is simply to highlight the woeful state of revenue raising systems throughout the OECD.  This reflects the simple reality that taxation is an area of public policy that is particularly vulnerable to corruption via rent-seeking and, once corrupted, becomes very difficult to reform.

Costello will almost certainly use the report’s findings to re-assert his authority over the tax debate, while at the same time seeking to counter demands for a renewed tax reform effort in Australia.  It confirms Costello’s position as the most conservative politician in Australia, in the non-political sense of the term.

posted on 27 February 2006 by skirchner in Economics

(1) Comments | Permalink | Main

| More

Comments

Here’s another contribution to the global tax debate:
http://www.house.gov/jec/tax/04-20-04.pdf
Perhaps Messrs Warburton and Hendy could copy/paste from there?  All Cossie wants is a few comparison tables showing how well we’re doing.

Costello doesn’t have the courage to take on Howard and his cherished FTB.  We are stuck with middle class welfare churn while the suburban solicitor is still in the Lodge.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  02/27  at  01:58 PM



Post a Comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Follow insteconomics on Twitter