About
Articles
Monographs
Working Papers
Reviews
Archive
Contact
 
 

Real Prices or Relative Prices? The Dow-Gold Ratio

Robert Prechter’s January Elliott Wave Theorist (you can sign-up for a free copy here) presents one of Bob’s favourite charts, namely the Dow-gold ratio.  The ratio is currently around 13, down from a peak around 44.12 in the late 1990s.  Prechter argues that this ratio represents the Dow denominated in real terms.  This is true only if you think the gold price benchmarks real purchasing power.  We could equally measure the Dow in terms of any other commodity (as Prechter sometimes does with oil).  Since commodity prices are typically more volatile than consumer prices, they are a poor benchmark for consumer purchasing power, which is best measured with respect to the CPI.

Rather than a real price, the Dow-gold ratio is better viewed as a relative price.  The ratio tell us that equity prices have recently underperformed commodity prices.  This should not come as a surprise, since equities typically underperform in an inflationary environment.  The Great Inflation of the 1970s was notoriously associated with a rolling multi-year bear market in stocks.

While Prechter is notoriously bearish equities, he has also been bearish gold, so his case for gold is based on relative performance.  But the implication to be drawn from the Dow-gold ratio is that equities as an asset class are becoming cheaper relative to commodities as an asset class.  Relative value is thus increasingly on the side of equities, not commodities.

posted on 22 February 2008 by skirchner in Economics, Financial Markets

(1) Comments | Permalink | Main

| More

Comments

...unless you don’t believe in mean reversion, like many of your other commenters.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  02/22  at  05:46 AM



Post a Comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Follow insteconomics on Twitter