About
Articles
Monographs
Working Papers
Reviews
Archive
Contact
 
 

Lehman Brothers’ Failure Was Not Pivotal

Even Steven Pearlstein recognises that the failure to rescue Lehman Brothers was not the pivotal event of last year’s financial crisis:

subsequent events have only confirmed that, if Lehman had somehow been rescued, things would not have turned out a whole lot better for Citigroup, or Washington Mutual or Wachovia or Bank of America, or any of the institutions that eventually needed cash injections from the Treasury. And it certainly would have done nothing to save AIG or Merrill, whose rescues were set in motion during the same Lehman weekend. For the reality is that, underlying the liquidity crisis of last fall was a massive credit crisis—too many risky loans made on loose terms and based on overly optimistic assumptions. Lehman’s failure may have sped up the process by which all this lousy lending was revealed and the losses acknowledged, but the financial reckoning was inevitable.

The final point is a political one. A year ago, in the wake of the Bear Stearns rescue, the public—left, right and center—was hopping mad about government bailouts of Wall Street. Paulson isn’t just kidding when he says that if he had used taxpayer money to save Lehman, impeachment proceedings would have begun against him the following day.

 

posted on 06 September 2009 by skirchner in Economics, Financial Markets

(1) Comments | Permalink | Main

| More

Comments

“Paulson isn’t just kidding when he says that if he had used taxpayer money to save Lehman, impeachment proceedings would have begun against him the following day.”

I don’t follow Paulson’s logic here.  If this is true, then why were there no impeachment proceedings after all the other bailouts?

I think we need to look elsewhere for an explanation of his actions.  The most plausible one is that he was trying to protect his Goldman Sachs buddies.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  09/06  at  11:46 AM



Post a Comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Follow insteconomics on Twitter