About
Articles
Monographs
Working Papers
Reviews
Archive
Contact
 
 

How to Kill Animal Spirits: Banking Banana Skins

The PWC/CSFI Survey of Bank Risk, aka Banking Banana Skins 2010, finds political interference is the number one risk facing the banking industry:

Having bailed the banks out, governments are pushing them to keep lending through the recession, against their better judgment. A director at a large UK bank said that “political meddling in the financial sector is almost universally contradictory and negative. One can’t lend more to support the economy and build up capital bases at the same time”. A credit analyst at a large Japanese bank said that “political interference in both banking and regulation is likely to lead to a mis-allocation of resources, which will probably increase, not decrease, the risk profile of the system”.

In 2005 and 2006, ‘too much regulation’ topped the list of concerns and is still the main concern in the Asia-Pacific region. 

Here is another banking banana skin.

posted on 02 February 2010 by skirchner in Economics, Financial Markets

(1) Comments | Permalink | Main

| More

Comments

Regarding that second banking banana skin, there may be another angle
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/sydney-confidential/was-banker-set-up-over-saucy-miranda/story-e6frewz0-1225826576571

Posted by Lorenzo  on  02/04  at  08:14 PM



Post a Comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Follow insteconomics on Twitter