About
Articles
Monographs
Working Papers
Reviews
Archive
Contact
 
 

Bretton Woods Revivalism in the WSJ

More tiresome hard money ratbaggery in the WSJ, this time from Bretton Woods revivalist, Judy Shelton:

The massive currency swings that reign between the dollar, the euro, Japanese yen, British pound, Canadian dollar, Swedish krona and Swiss franc wreak havoc on demand-and-supply outcomes for goods traded across borders. The New York Board of Trade’s U.S. Dollar Index, which tracks the dollar’s value relative to a basket of those six other currencies, has tumbled 34% since its July 2001 peak. Why pontificate about the importance of eliminating tariffs to promote open markets when the impact of a gyrating dollar is far more devastating, far more protectionist in its effect on global free trade?

It is time for the U.S. to acknowledge what we have tried to wave off under the pretense of allowing free markets to decree the value of our currency.

If we truly believe in a global marketplace where outcomes are determined by competition and competence, not localized monetary policies, we need a global monetary unit of measure. We need a meaningful global currency.

Bretton Woods broke down precisely because fixed exchange rates wrecked havoc by transmitting economic shocks, including monetary and fiscal policy mistakes, around the world.

posted on 27 September 2007 by skirchner in Economics, Financial Markets

(1) Comments | Permalink | Main

| More

Comments

The comment by Ms Shelton is even more curious if we look at what has been quoted. With the USD weakening by 34% since July 2001, this should have increased the price of imports, which is similar to (but entirely different from) raising tarriffs. Surely Ms Shelton should be happy about this - but apparently not.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  09/27  at  11:01 AM



Post a Comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Follow insteconomics on Twitter